Mercedes-Benz E-Class estate

22/06/2010 in Fleet Cars, Car Reviews, First Drive

  • Bookmark and Share

" Mercedes-Benz has always taken a more traditional approach to estate cars than its German rivals. "

  • Mercedes-Benz E-Class estate
P11D Price: £ 33,290
Benefit in kind: 22
Combined MPG: 46
CO2 Emission: 159
Graduate VED: 150
On Sale Year: n/a
Engine Size: n/a
Transmission: n/a
Number of Gears: n/a
Residual Value
3 Years 60K: £ 13,475
4 years 80K: £ 9,725
Running Cost (PPM)
3 Years 60K: 48.66
4 Years 80K: 46.15
Wholelife Costs
3 Years 60K: £ 29,196
4 Years 80K: £ 36,920
Running Costs

Mercedes-Benz has always taken a more traditional approach to estate cars than its German rivals.

For one thing, it actually calls them estates rather than names like Touring and Avant, which try to bring unnecessary excitement to what for fleets is the workhorse or family-car class.

And it has always been careful to design a really useful load capacity through its generous boot space.

That approach continues with the E-class estate. At 695 litres with the rear seats up (1,950 with them down), the car beats its BMW 5 Series and Audi A6 rivals by 135 and 130 litres respectively.

The 1.8-litre petrol engine performs well and returns competitive figures – 185g/km CO2 and 35.3mpg comfortably beat the comparable A6 Avant’s 199g/km and 33.2mpg, and are only slightly behind the 5 Series Touring’s 182g/km and 36.2mpg.

On the road the E250’s seats provide good comfort and support – perfect for the motorway.

Away from the mile-munching, the E-class estate handles competently on twistier roads: it’s no 5 Series, but neither is it the anodyne offering of the old version.

The middle ground means greater comfort and an effortless drive.

The car also puts in a strong showing on residual values and running costs, splitting its two German rivals.

The 37% RV over three years/60,000 miles for the SE is just a point behind the equivalent new 5 Series Touring, and nine ahead of the A6.

Running costs are 50.97ppm (5 Series: 52.47ppm; A6: 59.49ppm).

Quibbles include a lazy semi automatic gearbox which slouches through the gears and a poor fit around the fuel flap, which didn’t sit flush with the body on our test vehicle, but otherwise a very accomplished performer.

Author
Stephen Briers
Editor


Comments (0)

Please login to leave a comment.

User name or email address:
 
Password:
 

Please do not tick this box if you are using a public computer



fleet poll

When did you last have your eyes tested?

In the past year: 52.4 %

In the past 12 to 24 months: 27 %

In the past two to five years: 14.3 %

More than five years ago: 6.3 %

Vote Now



Car Tax Calculator
Compare Fuel Prices
CO2 emissions calculator