Fleet News

Third of fleets fail to teach road safety basics

Almost one in three fleets is failing to educate or train their drivers in key areas of road safety.

Brake and Licence Bureau questioned 228 fleets about driver education and the topics they cover, including mobile phone use and speeding. Around half (49%) operate fewer than 100 vehicles.

It found that 29% do not provide education or awareness on any of the key topics it listed, while the most common areas covered were mobile phones and other distractions (63%), hazard awareness (58%) and speed awareness (57%).

However, the majority don’t instruct drivers to take some of the most important steps to protect vulnerable road users.

Two-thirds (68%) don’t tell drivers to slow down to 20mph around schools, homes and shops, and six in 10 (61%) don’t instruct drivers to look twice for bikes at junctions.

Although two-thirds (67%) instruct drivers not to use any kind of mobile phone at the wheel, only one in four (26%) tell drivers to switch their phones off.

Almost one in four (23%) do not tell drivers to take any of the simple, life-saving measures listed.

Ellie Pearson, senior professional engagement officer at Brake, said: “It’s crucial that all fleet operators are providing regular and ongoing education and awareness training for their drivers, and it’s worrying to see that three in 10 operators still fail to do this.
“It’s very positive to see operators providing training on key issues such as distraction and hazard awareness, but obviously we’d like to see a holistic approach to education, covering all areas of risk.”

It is estimated that up to 95% of crashes are down to driver error. It’s therefore vital that drivers understand the importance of safety and the simple steps they are expected to take to protect themselves and others.

A key risk for at-work drivers is mobile phone use. Brake studies show at-work drivers are much more likely to use mobiles at the wheel than those who do not drive for work.
Research has found that drivers speaking on phones are four times more likely to be in a crash that causes injury, whether on a hands-free or hand-held phone.

Mobile phones are not the only distraction risk. Eating and drinking, smoking and adjusting music players or sat-navs can also cause potentially fatal distractions. Distraction is estimated to account for almost one in four (22%) crashes.

Pearson told Fleet News she would like to see fleet operators promoting best practice safety advice through their education and awareness raising campaigns.

“For instance, while it’s encouraging to see operators educating their drivers on the dangers of using any type of phone at the wheel, we’d like to see them reinforcing that message by advising drivers to turn off their phone and keep it out of reach whilst driving,” she said.

A huge proportion of organisations are not taking basic steps to plan realistic schedules and efficient routes – essential principles in deterring speeding and protecting vulnerable road users. The survey suggests that just over half (56%) plan realistic schedules to remove the pressure on drivers to speed, and even fewer (46%) tell drivers that they won’t be penalised for running over time.

Only one in 10 (11%) plan routes to avoid areas where there are likely to be lots of people on foot or bike, and one in five (20%) don't take any of these advised actions at all.

Brake said that where driving cannot be avoided, planning journeys to reduce mileage and use the safest routes enables fleets to reduce their risk.

Efficient route planning also saves money by reducing mileage and avoiding congested areas such as town centres.

This can mean significant savings for fleets as fuel can account for up to 19% of a fleet vehicle’s total cost of ownership.

Previous Brake surveys have found that employees who drive for work are more likely to report speeding and risky speed-related manoeuvres such as overtaking, than staff who do not drive for work.

One measure with great potential for preventing speeding and reducing casualties is intelligent speed adaptation (ISA).

ISA uses GPS combined with a digital map of speed limits to keep vehicles to the posted limit on each road, either by advising the driver of the limit through a signal (advisory ISA), or automatically decreasing acceleration if a driver exceeds the limit, with or without the driver being able to override this (voluntary or mandatory ISA).
Controlled trials of ISA in the UK have indicated voluntary ISA could reduce road deaths by 21%, and mandatory ISA could reduce deaths by 46%. More than half (54%) of respondents said they were aware of ISA and know at least a little about the benefits, but only 5% have actually tried it, showing the huge scope for promoting the use of ISA across the fleet industry.

Pearson concluded: “It’s reassuring to see that more than half of fleets are aware of ISA technology, although given that the take-up rate for using the technology is so low (5%), more needs to be done to promote and develop ISA adoption throughout the industry.”

Click here for safety and risk management best practice and procurement insight

Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Comment as guest


Login  /  Register

Comments

  • Edward Handley - 01/12/2014 22:03

    There is nothing in this survey that will raise any eyebrows. There is an assumption across a wide swathe of business that possession of a driving licence means the holder is a properly trained driver. If someone holds a Category B licence, obtained by passing a car test in a small hatchback it is assumed they must be competent to drive any vehicle they are licensed for - including 3500 kg vans, etc.

    There has been huge controversy over the Driver CPC for vocational licence holders which requires anyone driving tucks or buses to take 35 hours of refresher training every 5 years and numerous letters have appeared in the trade press saying that it is ridiculous and a waste of time and money. I have to agree that the DCPC in its current form is not working well but anyone who drives on a motorway and sees all those "professional drivers" tailgating the truck in front of them will know that we would all benefit it they had some decent refresher or development training!

    Driving a motor vehicle is the most dangerous thing most people do in their working lives but most employers, including National and Local Government and some of the biggest companies, do little more than check driving licences before sending their staff out on the road.

    All too often even licence checks are done by someone who has never even been trained to read a driving licence - it is just assumed that anyone can do it, which is why when assessing and training drivers for employers I regularly come across drivers who are not licensed or are not complying with the conditions stated on their licences!

    Do a quick self test: Take out your photocard driving licence and look at the back. On the right hand side are code numbers such as 01, 78, 101, 107, etc. Do you know what they mean? If you do not, you should not be checking licences and you could even be driving illegally!

    Are you worried yet? You should be - unless you have a qualified transport manager or driving assessor, the odds are that the person who checks driving licences for your employer does not know what to look for.

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register
Compare costs of your company cars

Looking to acquire new vehicles? Check how much they'll cost to run with our Car Running Cost calculator.

What is your BIK car tax liability?

The Fleet News car tax calculator lets you work out tax costs for both employer and employee