Fleet News

Credit hire legal battle enters the final stages

A HIGH stakes battle between the insurance and credit hire industries, which has led to a crippling stand-off over payments for vehicle rentals, has entered its final stages. The dispute focuses on the terms of contracts between credit hire companies which supply temporary replacement cars to the non-fault parties involved in road traffic accidents and their customers.

Insurers claim many of these contracts fall foul of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and are therefore unenforceable in law. A test case, Dimond v Lovell, found in favour of credit hire firm 1st Automotive, but a Court of Appeal ruling overturned this verdict and a further appeal moved to the House of Lords and was heard last month. The debate over whether credit hire agreements are enforceable has provoked a long-running row as some insurers have been withholding payments for credit hire until they hear of the decision of the House of Lords.

Millions of pounds in rentals are at stake and the stand-off has forced some credit hire firms out of business, claiming they were being squeezed by the insurance industry. At the House of Lords, much of the three-day hearing involved an examination of the Consumer Credit Act, but industry insiders believe that the appeal might succeed, which would open the floodgates for backdated claims from insurers. A spokesman for the House of Lords Appeal Office said that judgement on the case should be published before Easter.

Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Login to comment


No comments have been made yet.

Compare costs of your company cars

Looking to acquire new vehicles? Check how much they'll cost to run with our Car Running Cost calculator.

What is your BIK car tax liability?

The Fleet News car tax calculator lets you work out tax costs for both employer and employee