Fleet News

Contract hire survey: diesel SUVs

LIES, damn lies and statistics. If you believe what you read in some quarters, sales of SUVs are on the wane as people try to combat their carbon footprint by moving away from these vehicles.

Which is all well and good, if only it were true. Granted, private sales are slipping slightly, although this is more to do with some big-selling models being in run-out last year (Land Rover Freelander and BMW X5 to name but two), but in the fleet sector sales are booming.

And this trend is only going to go one way this year thanks to an unprecedented amount of launch activity in the SUV sector.

Ford, Vauxhall, Chevrolet, Mitsubishi, Volkswagen, Renault, Peugeot and Citroën will all launch new SUVs this year, and the tail end of 2006 saw the new Land Rover Freelander2 arrive.

Hot on its heels is the new Honda CR-V which will be aiming to build on the huge success of its predecessor. The CR-V is loved by fleets who need to cater for user-choosers – it has a strong RV, legendary build quality and reliability, and it’s also a good car to drive for a vehicle of this type with its higher centre of gravity.

But how does it compare financially against the current cream of the SUV crop?

  • What our panel said

    SEAN BINGHAM
    Director of new business, Bank of Scotland Vehicle Finance

    LET’S start with the premise that this comparison is based on on-road use and not off-road qualities. That being the case the CR-V easily comes out on top with refined handling, best economy, lowest CO2 together with quality and reliability.

    The Toyota’s sharp handling, economy, low CO2, reliability and looks place it second.

    The new Freelander2 would score better but it is the most expensive car by a big margin.

    The Nissan does everything you want at very competitive cost, whereas the Hyundai struggles to compete.

    The Jeep has the worst performance and economy, and top rate tax liability.

    IVOR JOHNSON
    Fleet management and operations director, Leasedrive Velo

    THE quickest and most frugal, the CR-V is also the most refined. Clean styling and a good interior make for a complete package.

    Toyota’s RAV4 is a close second with a sharp drive and strong build quality.

    The Freelander is let down by a history of unreliability and the new model must address this. The X-trail has always been a top performer – it’s reliable, practical and drives well.

    One to be taken seriously is the Santa Fe – much improved, it ticks all the boxes.

    Bringing up the rear is the Jeep. It’s thirsty, falls into the highest tax brand and has a poor reliability record.

    ANDY BROWN
    Operations director, Inchcape Fleet Solutions

    THE Freelander2 is a sector-defining car with the bonus of first-rate off-road ability.

    Honda’s styling of the CR-V has received mixed reviews but we prefer this sportier iteration. Performance and refinement are impressive.

    The X-trail has been consistently successful and residuals continue to out-perform expectations.

    For an SUV the RAV4 drives very well. Interior space and quality are good and the diesel engine feels very punchy.

    The new Santa Fe moves the model upmarket and the seven-seat model is worth the extra money for the added flexibility.

    Although it is well priced the Jeep looks a little cheap inside.

    DAVID HOSKING
    Managing director, Tuskerdirect

    OF this group, the RAV4 is modern, stylish and appeals to the family driver.

    The CR-V is a great, economical vehicle and, like the Toyota, is a nice drive. Despite being a worthy contender in this group, the Freelander2 is not yet being financially supported enough to allow it to compete in terms of monthly rentals.

    The bigger-engined, less economical vehicles like the Jeep will undoubtedly suffer longer term. Although it’s a good product, the Santa Fe doesn’t yet have the badge appeal of the others and seems a little over-priced when compared to the other entries in the group.

  • AVERAGE LEASING RATES

    THANKS to a high level of support, the X-trail has the lowest monthly rental bill, just £1 ahead of the Toyota – it has less support but a better RV. The Hyundai is nearly £100 a month more than the Nissan.

  • CO2 EMISSIONS

    THE Honda and Toyota both fall into the 24% benefit-in-kind tax band. The Hyundai and Land Rover are in the 28% banding, the Nissan is taxed at 30% and the Jeep at the maximum 35%.

  • FUEL ECONOMY

    THE Jeep’s larger capacity 2.8-litre engine counts against it and is massively behind the Honda, which is the most frugal at 43.5mpg. The Hyundai, Land Rover and Nissan are closely matched.

  • RESIDUAL VALUES

    THE Land Rover badge carries a lot of clout and so it proves here, with the Freelander2 notching the highest RV forecast. The Honda and Toyota run it close, while the Hyundai’s performance is poor.

  • AVERAGE DISCOUNT

    SURPRISINGLY for such a new model, Honda is being fairly generous with support, offering an average of 14% off the CR-V. Land Rover is providing the least support of the six, with 10% off the Freelander2.

  • AVERAGE MAINTENANCE

    THE Nissan will be the cheapest, costing under £1,900 in service, maintenance and repair bills. Close behind is the Honda. The rest all cost more than £2,000, with the Jeep and Land Rover well adrift.

    The results

    1. Honda CR-V 2.2 i-CTDi SE

    P11D price: £19,802
    2007 BIK bill (40%): £1,900
    2007 VED bill: £160

    RENTAL RATES:
    BoSVF: £393
    Inchcape: £366
    Leasedrive Velo: £358
    Tuskerdirect: £349

    VERDICT: A strong RV, low SMR rates and a fairly decent level of support from Honda cement the CR-V in top spot. On-road performance draws praise.

    2. Toyota RAV4 2.2 D-4D XT3

    P11D price: £20,117
    2007 BIK bill (40%): £1,931
    2007 VED bill £160

    RENTAL RATES:
    BoSVF: £353
    Inchcape: £338
    Leasedrive Velo: £359
    Tuskerdirect: £363

    VERDICT: Pretty much matches the Honda pound for pound and has lower lease rates, but it loses out more for not being as good to drive rather than fiscal r easons.

    3. Land Rover Freelander2 TD4 S

    P11D price: £20,702
    2007 BIK bill (40%): £2,318
    2007 VED bill £195

    RENTAL RATES:
    BoSVF: £405
    Inchcape: £389
    Leasedrive Velo: £422
    Tuskerdirect: £425

    VERDICT: Great on and off-road, but the previous model’s reliability issues still haunt it. RV is a joint sector best, although there is little support from Land Rover.

    4. Nissan X-trail 2.2 dCi SE

    P11D price: £19,762
    2007 BIK bill (40%): £2,371
    2007 VED bill: £195

    RENTAL RATES:
    BoSVF: £349
    Inchcape: £340
    Leasedrive Velo: £344
    Tuskerdirect: £376

    VERDICT: Despite its age the Nissan still offers a strong RV. With the lowest front-end price and SMR costs, it offers the cheapest rentals.

    5. Jeep Cherokee 2.8 CRD Sport

    P11D price: £19,682
    2007 BIK bill (40%): £2,755
    2007 VED bill: £215

    RENTAL RATES:
    BoSVF: £420
    Inchcape: £392
    Leasedrive Velo: £425
    Tuskerdirect £449

    VERDICT: With the lowest fuel economy, highest CO2 emissions and an unconvincing on-road performance, the Jeep finds few friends in this comparison.

    6. Hyundai Santa Fe 2.2 CRTD GSi

    P11D price: £20,762
    2007 BIK bill (40%): £2,325
    2007 VED bill: £195

    RENTAL RATES:
    BoSVF: £420
    Inchcape: £433
    Leasedrive Velo: £452
    Tuskerdirect £449

    VERDICT: A vast improvement over the old model, but the Santa Fe is pricey at the front-end and lower RV gives it among the highest monthly rentals.

  • Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

    Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

    Login to comment

    Comments

    No comments have been made yet.

    Compare costs of your company cars

    Looking to acquire new vehicles? Check how much they'll cost to run with our Car Running Cost calculator.

    What is your BIK car tax liability?

    The Fleet News car tax calculator lets you work out tax costs for both employer and employee