Fleet News

Lead times improve, but issues remain for fleets

Fleet news logo

Long vehicle lead times are continuing to cause a headache for fleets with some companies axing brands from car choice lists.

Fleets have been forced to play the waiting game for the past three years due to the economic downturn, higher European demand for low CO2 models and the impact of the earthquake in Japan earlier this year.

Although things are improving – there is a 14-18 week wait for the average factory-ordered car compared to 18-20 weeks six to 12 months ago according to the BVRLA – there are still issues with a number of models.

“We’ve extended contracts where possible, but until lead times improve it’s easier to steer employees away from those models where we know lead times are an issue,” said one fleet manager, who did not want to be named.

The situation is also causing bad blood between leasing companies and manufacturers.

Tim Bowden, head of operations at Hitachi Capital Vehicle Solutions and chairman of the BVRLA’s technical and operational management committee, said: “Communication and accuracy of lead times has improved, but it has been frustrating that the apparent desire of some manufacturers to avoid bad news has given some customers the impression that leasing company inefficiencies are to blame.”

Neal Francis, managing director of Pendragon Contracts, added: “By failing to listen to a customer’s request, respond in a timely fashion and communicate proactively, manufacturers potentially risk a customer meltdown.”

LeasePlan is working to see if vehicle orders can be moved to other manufacturers or stock vehicles taken to offset any potential delay.

Matt Dyer, commercial director at LeasePlan, said: “We often look to offer alternatives that can give a significantly reduced delivery date – up to two months in some cases.”

The BVRLA said some manufacturers have increased production and many of those affected by the Japanese crisis have found alternative sources for parts or changed their model trim.

Toyota said its core products are sourced in Europe and anyone ordering European product now would not experience a significant delay.

As Japan has been back to full production since July, six to eight weeks is now the normal lead time for Lexus CT orders. However, other premium brands have issues due to higher demand than predicted.

Audi is facing “challenges” with the A4 saloon, A5 Sportback and Q7. All build slots for the A4 saloon are now filled for 2011, although Audi Centres will have the opportunity to reassign and amend a proportion of the orders filling the build slots if they have customer demand.

“Availability very much depends on the Audi Centre in question,” an Audi spokesman said.
Most BMW models have a three to four month lead time. However, customers who order an X3 are looking at delivery in February due to a limited allocation of right-hand drive models. Stephen Chater, corporate operations manager for BMW, said: “I don’t think we have longer lead times than any other manufacturer and the spotlight is not on us. I am pretty comfortable that we are meeting our customers’ expectations.”

Volkswagen has increased allocation for key cars such as the Passat. A spokesman said DSG supply has been much better this year although there are still some restrictions on availability.

However, some manufacturers may capitalise on the long lead times of others, with Steve Jelliss, fleet and remarketing director at Mazda, claiming the Mazda6 Business Line is well positioned to fill the gap. “Given its tax rating, specification levels and the fact there are long waiting lists for many alternatives from other manufacturers we are anticipating strong demand for the car,” he said.

By Sarah Tooze and Andrew Brady

Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Login to comment


  • hypercarleasing - 02/09/2011 11:38

    You cannot blame the fleet companies with the lead times on some family cars you would be quicker to order a Bentley

  • spaced - 02/09/2011 11:53

    I dont see wht manufacturers dont supply customers with interim vehicles. If I am spending £60k on a Range Rover Sport and I am expected to wait 6 months for deliver, I would like to see them supply me with a similar vehicles at a discounted hire rate, especially if I have a lease vehicle already and I have to hand it back.

  • chizzy - 02/09/2011 12:08

    What exacerbates the issue is the 'fogging' that some of the manufacturers create. Ask a straight forward question and they'll ignore that one and answer one that suits them. They will not accept responsibility, nor do they they actually care what affect the delays have on their customers. There are now some brands that we will actively try and steer customers away from where possible. What some of them need to understand is this - they have been making enemies during the 'good' times (for them), but there will come a time when they will not be quite so popular and they will then need some friends ... they may be disappointed to find that those friends will be very thin on the ground.

  • Vision - 03/09/2011 10:00

    Move away from the premium brands to companies such as hyundai and kia, not only will you get shorter lead times and better warranty, but it will also force premium brands to lower prices and get delivery acts together in the medium and longer term, and change the arrogant stance by some manufacturers. Cars like the I40 will likely be a hit with most fleets.

Compare costs of your company cars

Looking to acquire new vehicles? Check how much they'll cost to run with our Car Running Cost calculator.

What is your BIK car tax liability?

The Fleet News car tax calculator lets you work out tax costs for both employer and employee