Fleet News

Removing tax insurance check is ‘absurd’ say AA

The proposal by the DVLA to remove the insurance check when car owners apply for a tax disc is ‘absurd’, according to the AA.

Simon Douglas, director of broker AA Insurance, suggests it could “undo much the work carried out by the Motor Insurers’ Bureau, the Government and the insurance industry to tighten up enforcement of the law”.

He said: “To knock out a simple and almost fool-proof check that insurance is in place, once every year or six months, is madness.  It’s telling the public that it’s OK to delay or even avoid taking out cover.  

“It’s simply not good enough to rely on Continuous Insurance Enforcement (CIE) legislation which was introduced last year; and the police using automatic number plate recognition technology to identify uninsured vehicles after the event.  Surely it is better to ensure that vehicles are insured from the outset.”

Currently, application of a tax disc online confirms that both insurance and MoT are valid.  

If either has expired it is tangible reminder to the motorist to act promptly and alerts them if an error has been made.  

Those buying their tax disc at a Post Office currently need to produce a paper insurance certificate and Douglas said: “It would be far better for Post Office counter staff to make an electronic check against the Motor Insurance Database, given that a paper insurance certificate is no longer a compulsory requirement."

He added: “One out of every 25 motorists on Britain’s roads is driving without cover, a significant improvement over five years ago.  Even so, this is still one of the poorest uninsured driving records in Europe and now is not the time to knock out a legislative pillar that will take us back to square one.”


Click here for fleet insurance best practice and procurement insight

Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Login to comment

Comments

  • GrumpyOldMen - 17/10/2012 13:41

    I don't doubt that keeping the check in place serves a useful purpose but surely issuing a 12 month RFT when there is only 1 month left on the insurance is only slightly less absurd than no check at all? And when the judiciary hands out £50 fines to uninsured drivers who the hell cares if their car is insured or not anyway? Judges. Now there's something absurd.

Compare costs of your company cars

Looking to acquire new vehicles? Check how much they'll cost to run with our Car Running Cost calculator.

What is your BIK car tax liability?

The Fleet News car tax calculator lets you work out tax costs for both employer and employee