Fleet News

NAB to represent companies hit by Drive Assist collapse

The National Association of Bodyshops (NAB) has been nominated by some of the UK’s leading body repair specialists to represent them in a Creditors’ Committee looking into the conduct of directors of failed accident management company, Drive Assist.

When Drive Assist, once one of Britain’s leading non-fault accident vehicle replacement companies, collapsed in December 2012 with debts of more than £82 million, 150 bodyshops were left with more than £7m in unpaid repair bills.

Frank Harvey, head of NAB, said: “The NAB has agreed to represent any bodyshop creditor of Drive Assist in the committee being set up by the administrator, Zolfo Cooper.

“There’s no charge for our unconditional support and has been made available regardless of whether the affected bodyshop is a member of the association. 

“It is important that bodyshop interests are vigorously supported and that lessons are learnt for the future.”

NAB had previously taken legal advice on behalf of members affected by the Drive Assist collapse to try to recover outstanding monies but were advised that debts were unsecured and that settlement of outstanding invoices would be unlikely.

Harvey added: “The focus is now on the conduct of directors and, in particular, promises that were made to repairers concerning the ring fencing of funds paid to Drive Assist by insurers for vehicle repair work.

“We will communicate the outcomes of the Creditors’ Committee meetings promptly, and widely and will also use this experience to influence the conduct and behaviour of intermediaries involved in our industry going forward.”

The first meeting of the Drive Assist Creditors Committee is being held at the Birmingham offices of Zolfo Cooper today (Wednesday, October 22).

 



Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Comment as guest


Login  /  Register

Comments

  • Steve Tweed - 25/10/2014 08:45

    Great to see this happening the monies should have been ring fenced for all repairers but they were not and procedures not followed the pressure to ignore procedure appeared to come from the top downward so appeared not to be questioned This made for a great deal of bad feeling towards other creditors of DA when trying to recover their own assets from body shops which was understandable but mis directed and ended up making many lawyers better off to the cost of everyone else these funds needed to be Ring Fenced in future to ensure this is not repeated
    Good Luck

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register
Compare costs of your company cars

Looking to acquire new vehicles? Check how much they'll cost to run with our Car Running Cost calculator.

What is your BIK car tax liability?

The Fleet News car tax calculator lets you work out tax costs for both employer and employee