Fleet News

Risk management specialist shares smart motorway concerns

Highways England, smart motorways, smart motorway emergency refuge area, ERA.

Licence Check has added its voice to growing calls for smart motorways to be overhauled after a poll of customers revealed that more than 80% thought they were unsafe or could be improved.

The licence checking and risk management specialist, part of the Ebbon Group, surveyed its customer base, asking for their opinion on all-lane running motorways, which no longer feature a traditional hard shoulder or those which have a dynamic hard shoulder that converts to an additional traffic lane at peak times.

More than half (56%) of respondents said they thought smart motorways were not safe and a further one in four (28%) said they thought they could be improved. Fewer than one in five (17%) thought that they were safe.

The findings support those of a new Transport Select Committee report which concluded there was not enough safety and economic data to justify continuing with the Government’s plans to roll out an additional 300 miles of all-lane running motorway by 2025. 

The report said Government plans to remove the hard shoulder from all future smart motorways were premature and that it should pause the rollout of new all-lane running schemes until five years of safety and economic data was available for every scheme introduced before 2020.

National Highways, the body responsible for the nation’s motorways, is currently trying to convince motorists of the safety of smart motorways with its biggest ever motorway safety campaign advising them to “Go left” if they get into difficulties with their vehicle and seek an emergency refuge area (ERA).

Terry Hiles, general manager at Licence Check, said that a review by the Department for Transport (DfT) had made a series of recommendations regarding smart motorways, but that they were some way off from being implemented.

“These include converting dynamic hard shoulder motorways to all-lane running, rather than having a hard shoulder which can be switched on and off during peak times, as this was deemed too confusing for motorists,” he said.

“They also advocated the more widespread deployment of stranded vehicle technology and increased monitoring to identify stricken vehicles more quickly and close affected lanes faster.

“They also suggested relocating the ERAs so that they are no more than ¾ to 1.0 miles apart. However, these recommendations are not set to come in for another three years and until then the existing concerns remain.”

Critics say the ERAs are inconveniently spaced, typically 1.5 miles apart, and that anyone breaking down or being involved in an accident has little chance in reaching them unaided. Some 38 motorists have been killed on smart motorways in the last five years, according to a BBC Panorama investigation.

Meanwhile, records show that there has been a 20-fold increase in the number of near-misses – an incident with the potential to cause injury or ill health - on just one section of the M25, since the hard shoulder was removed.

Motoring organisation, the RAC, and safety charity, Brake, are among bodies that have voiced concerns about the current system of operation on smart motorways.

Both the RAC and the AA have also urged Highways England to increase the use and coverage radar technology to identify broken down vehicles, after evidence showed that it can take up to 17 minutes to identify a breakdown.

The AA has also advised that its patrols will not attend breakdowns on smart motorways as Hiles said: “Clearly our customers echo our reservations about the overall safety of smart motorways.

“If you are unlucky enough to break down or be involved in an incident on a smart motorway you are faced with some unappealing choices.

“Where possible, you should attempt to use an ERA, which is marked with a large blue sign featuring an orange SOS telephone symbol.

“Arrows will direct you into an indicated area, where you should stop and switch on your hazard warning lights. Occupants should then exit the vehicle from the passenger side and stand behind the crash barrier, while the driver should phone Highways England who will provide further instructions.

“If you are unable to reach the nearest ERA, you should try to move on to the verge if there is no safety barrier and it is safe to do so. In all cases, switch on your hazard warning lights.

“If you are forced to stop in the nearside lane, exit your vehicle via the nearside and wait behind the safety barrier, if there is one.

“If it is not possible to get to the nearside lane or exit your vehicle safely, then you should stay in your vehicle with your seat belt on and dial '999' if you have access to a mobile phone.

“When the relevant highways authority becomes aware of a breakdown or an incident on they should switch on a red cross sign on the gantries above the lane you're in to stop traffic from entering it.”

Click here for safety and risk management best practice and procurement insight

Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Login to comment


No comments have been made yet.

Related content

Compare costs of your company cars

Looking to acquire new vehicles? Check how much they'll cost to run with our Car Running Cost calculator.

What is your BIK car tax liability?

The Fleet News car tax calculator lets you work out tax costs for both employer and employee