Fleet News

Hands-free phones ‘just as distracting’ as hand-held devices

New research from psychologists at the University of Sussex has found driving while talking on a hands-free phone can be just as distracting as talking on a hand-held mobile. 

Brake is now renewing its calls for the government to look again at the laws around driving and mobile phone use.  

The study, published in the Transportation Research Journal, shows that drivers who are engaged in conversations that spark their visual imagination are much less able to spot and react to potential hazards.

When the drivers involved in the study were asked about a subject that required them to visualise it, they focussed on a smaller area of the road ahead of them and failed to see hazards, even when they looked directly at them.

The researchers claim their evidence shows conversations may use more of the brain’s visual processing resources than previously understood. Having a conversation which requires a driver to use their visual imagination creates competition for the brain’s processing capacity that is also focussing on driving. This results in drivers missing road hazards that they might otherwise have spotted.

This is the latest study to look at the increased dangers involved with driving and mobile phone use. Previous research has estimated that up to 22% of crashes could be caused by some kind of distraction and drivers who perform a secondary task at the wheel, like using a mobile, are up to three times more likely to crash.

Also, the effect of talking on a phone while driving has already been shown to be worse than drinking certain amounts of alcohol. Driver reaction times are 30% slower while using a hands-free phone than driving with a blood alcohol level of 80mg alcohol per 100ml blood (the current limit in England and Wales), and nearly 50% slower than driving under normal conditions.

Lucy Amos, research advisor for Brake, said: “Distracted driving is a major cause behind road crashes; pulling the drivers’ attention away from the road and its potential hazards, potentially leading to fatal outcomes. This new study is only the latest of many which adds weight to extending the existing legislation to cover all mobile phone use within a vehicle, not just the use of hand-held mobile devices.

“We call on the government to take action and remove the clear and present danger of mobile phones on our roads.”      

As well as disproving the popular misconception that using a mobile phone while driving is safe as long as it’s hands-free, the researchers from Sussex also say there are still differences between a hands-free conversation and a chatty passenger. A passenger will usually moderate the conversation when road hazards arise, whereas someone on the other end of a phone is oblivious to the other demands on the driver and so keeps talking.

Kevin Clinton, head of road safety at the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA), said: “We are not surprised at the findings of this study, as it confirms previous research that using any type of mobile phone while driving is distracting and dangerous and increases the risk of crashing.

“Although many people think that using a hands-free mobile phone while driving is safe, it is not. All the research clearly shows that using a hands-free phone does not significantly reduce the risks because the problems are caused mainly by the mental distraction and divided attention of using a phone at the same time as driving.

“RoSPA, which was instrumental in bringing into force the law banning the use of handheld mobile phones behind the wheel, would like to see that extended to hands-free for these reasons.

“Sadly, people continue to lose their lives on our roads in crashes caused by drivers who are distracted because they use a mobile phone. This can so easily be avoided by all drivers switching off their phones while driving, and only checking messages once they have stopped in a safe place.”

Does your company car policy permit the use of a hands-free phone while driving? Click here to vote in our poll.

Click here for safety and risk management best practice and procurement insight

Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Login to comment

Comments

  • Darren - 08/06/2016 11:43

    I'm sorry but I really don't see how this can be true. I am not saying that hands free phones are not a distraction at all, but compared to driving one handed or with a phone jammed between your head and shoulder, I can't see how speaking into the air is a comparable distraction. I understand that this article is trying to suggest it's mental distraction, but I think the way the phone is used and how in control of the vehicle must be taken into account when comparing these two activities. Also I think it depends on how able a driver is at driving 'on auto', where the driver is competent enough to be able to drive safely without having to think about everything they're doing. I've seen drivers who clearly need to be more focused on the road than others. As an example to this, I have been driving a car daily for 25 years and I am able to 'auto pilot' very well. Whereas I have been riding a motorbike for only 3 years, and I am still having to think about every road junction, every shoulder check etc. Same roads, same person different level of competency.

  • Diarmuid Fahy - 08/06/2016 12:29

    There's nothing new about this research. It has been proven time and time again in study after study all over the world that using a hand-held phone whilst driving impairs the driver's ability and makes them more likely to be involved in a collision. This study was carried out by TRL in 2002: http://www.trl.co.uk/umbraco/custom/report_files/TRL547.pdf I'm sure every driver that uses a phone whilst driving is sure that they're safe, in full control and paying attention to what's going on around them. They are, however, wrong. The research we read has been carried out by trained, qualified experts in the field. They are better able to judge and quantify this risk than somebody going on their feelings. I would also say that I worry about any driver that says they can "auto pilot" well. For God's sake don't try that on a motorbike, no matter how long you've been riding.

  • Darren - 08/06/2016 13:51

    @Diarmuid Fahy I understand what you are saying, but I've always used hands free when driving and I've covered well over half a million car miles with only one at fault accident, and that was when I was 17, long before mobile phones. Besides there are caveats in this article, too many lines to read between. Eg " can be just as distracting"; "could be caused by some kind of distraction" etc, but then it becomes a "clear and present danger". I'm sure someone paid a lot of money for these tests and needed the results to be fit for purpose, not the first time that has happened. So if this does make a difference, where do we stop? Ban talking to passengers, ban listening to or singing along to the radio? Also this will be virtually impossible to police. Was he talking on a hands free kit or talking at the radio? Are there enough police on the road to actually police this? I doubt it. there isn't enough to police current laws like hand held phones or smoking in a company vehicle or correct type of booster seats installed for children, they won't care about this one ether.

  • Diarmuid Fahy - 08/06/2016 14:23

    Darren, follow the link I gave and read the research. There's a huge difference between talking on a phone and speaking to a passenger, just too long and boring to go into here - it's all in the TRL paper. Believe me, if you can think of a question on the hypothesis, the researchers will have too, and they'll have factored it in, tested it and included it in the results. It's very easy to jump to the wrong conclusions when you look at a one-line synopsis of 6-12 months worth of work, so I always recommend that you read at least the Abstract. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847816000085 I'm not sure what you mean by "fit for purpose" but it has been peer-reviewed and published in what is probably the premier scientific journal in the field. As a qualified practitioner in the area of Driver Psychology and Behaviour, that's good enough for me.

  • Jason Lebrecht - 09/06/2016 04:02

    We are connected to just about everything at this point, but continue to fail with adoption in the Distracted Driver Space. We have got to figure out a solution that forces safe driving. I still see people weaving all over the road with a phone to their ear, it's crazy.

  • bob the engineer - 09/06/2016 08:47

    There is a risk but its up to responsible business users to manage the risk, in our company training provides an important part and amongst our millions of miles I have never seen mobile phone use as a factor in any accident (unless you count leaving it on the roof and driving away!). We train drivers to not answer or call if they feel unsafe to do so. We train them to identify to a caller immediately that they are driving, we train office staff to ask them if its safe to talk at the moment and terminate if the driver is uncertain, in all cases keeping conversations brief and to the point. We train drivers to pause conversation if they need to momentarily concentrate fully, we train office people to expect pauses and be patient. We expect drivers to adapt, slow down, avoid non essential manoeuvres, open larger gaps. The majority of our drivers have many years experience of managing these situations. Personally I am far more worried about the other connectivity being foisted on us by manufacturers and due to increase rapidly.

Compare costs of your company cars

Looking to acquire new vehicles? Check how much they'll cost to run with our Car Running Cost calculator.

What is your BIK car tax liability?

The Fleet News car tax calculator lets you work out tax costs for both employer and employee