Fleet Leasing

Government cuts plug-in car grant - Outlander PHEV and Prius no longer eligible

Go Ultra Low Company

The plug-in car grant will be cut by £1,000 and no longer apply to hybrid cars with a range of less than 70 zero emission miles, from November 9.

The Government said the reduction in funding - from £4,500 to £3,500 - for the cleanest cars, and withdrawing the grant completely for the likes of the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and the Toyota Prius Plug-in, was a sign of its success.

The 22% cut in grant value for the cleanest cars also reflected the “recent reductions in the price of electric vehicles”, it claimed.

Furthermore, the Department for Transport (DfT) warned that it would be prepared to implement the new rate before November 9, if the news sparked a rush from buyers eager to qualify for the grant at current levels. However, it has only committed to fund the "next 35,000 of the cleanest vehicles", according to the official announcement.

RAC head of roads policy Nicholas Lyes said: “The reduction of the plug-in car grant is a major blow to anyone hoping to go green with their next vehicle choice and makes little sense when we need to focus our efforts on lowering emissions from vehicles.

“Of particular concern, some popular zero emission capable plug-in hybrid models will lose their plug-in car grant altogether.”

In all, just 19 cars will be eligible for the plug-in car grant, with 20 models no longer qualifying under the new rules.

Lyes continued: “With up-front costs still a huge barrier for those hoping to switch to an electric vehicle, this move from the Government is a big step backwards and is in stark contrast to countries like Norway where generous tax incentives have meant that it has one of the highest ownership levels of ultra-low emission vehicles of anywhere in the world.”

John Pryor, ACFO chairman, said: “The Government’s decision to reduce financial support for plug-in vehicles is, quite frankly bonkers. Demand for plug-in vehicles is already extremely limited and the decision to reduce the amount of financial support available through the Plug-in Car Grant is likely to reduce demand still further.

First introduced in 2011, the plug-in car grant (PICG) has provided a discount to the price of more than 160,000 new ultra-low emission vehicles.

Category 1 cars, with CO₂ emissions of less than 50g/km and a zero emission range of at least 70 miles, received 35% off the purchase price, up to a maximum of £4,500.

Meanwhile, category 2 cars, with CO₂ emissions of less than 50g/km and a zero emission range between 10 and 69 miles, as well as category 3 cars, with CO₂ emissions of 50 to 75g/km and a zero emission range of at least 20 miles, benefitted from a grant for 35% of the purchase price, up to a maximum of £2,500.

It has helped the plug-in hybrid market become more established, but the Government says it now wants to focus its support on zero emission models like pure electric and hydrogen fuel cell cars.

However, the cut in funding for ultra-low emission vehicles comes after the Government had already been warned that if it is to stand a chance of achieving its Road to Zero pledge of half of all new cars being ultra-low emission by 2030, it must bring forward planned reductions in company car tax rates and provide guarantees it will stay low.

Company car drivers considering a pure electric or hybrid car face a three-percentage point increase in benefit-in-kind (BIK) tax rates from next April, before rates fall the following year.

Up to the end of August, 8,980 pure EVs had been registered, compared with 9,030 in the first eight months of 2017 – a fall of 0.6%. However, when taken together with other ultra-low emission vehicles (ULEVs), Government figures show that 33,792 cars qualified for the plug-in-car grant during the same period, a 32.6% year-on-year increase.

Last year, 53,203 new ULEVs were registered in the UK, up 27% from 41,837 units in 2016. However, they accounted for just 1.7% of all new vehicle registrations – up from 1.2% one year previously and 0.9% two years before.

To achieve the Government’s ambition for at least half of new cars to be ULEVs (sub-50g/km CO2) by 2030, registrations would have to rise 30% year-on-year for the next 12 years.

BVRLA chief executive Gerry Keaney labelled the decision to cut the grant short-sighted and said it would only serve to "stifle the uptake of electric vehicles".

“The removal of the plug-in grant incentive makes our calls to expedite the shift to a 2% tax rate for ULEV company cars even more crucial, as without either measure there is very little motivating motorists to choose a low emission vehicle," continued Keaney. "Only last month the Prime Minister was setting out a variety of excellent plans to stimulate the production of electric vehicles and support the implementation of additional charging infrastructure. All this good work will be for nothing if the demand side of the equation is not equally incentivised.

“We are calling on the Government to rethink this decision as a matter of urgency. The plug-in grant, together with our calls for the leveraging of the company car tax within this month’s Budget, would actively encourage motorists to make less polluting vehicle choices. Not doing so puts the Road to Zero ambitions in real jeopardy.”

Mitsubishi said it was “surprised and disappointed” by the decision. Rob Lindley, managing director at Mitsubishi Motors in the UK, told Fleet News: “The decision to suddenly end grant support for some of the greenest vehicles on the road is extremely disappointing.”

However, as the segment leader for the past four years, Lindley said the company was “confident” that fleets will still see the benefits of running the car compared to conventional petrol-and diesel-powered SUVs.

Liberal Democrat environment spokesperson Tim Farron said: "This short-sighted decision from Government is a dagger to the heart of their claims that they are serious about improving air quality. 

"Encouraging people to buy cars that are less polluting makes sense and Liberal Democrats demand better for our environment than more Conservative cuts.”

For the government’s Road to Zero targets to be achievable, Tim Porter, managing director of Lex Autolease, said: "We need to see almost a 23-fold increase in ultra-low emission vehicle uptake, and incentives like the plug-in car grant are key to making this possible.  

"While the grant for zero emission vehicles will continue – albeit with smaller contributions available for drivers – the 2030 target relates to both ultra low and zero emission vehicles. This means there is still a role for plug-in hybrids to play which is key, given there are also still relatively few zero emission vehicles on the market."

Matt Walters, head of consultancy and customer data services at LeasePlan, believes the lack of warning has also put the industry on the back foot. However, he believes there are some positives. "The scheme being extended into the next decade is good news as it continues to encourage drivers to go green," he said. 

"We are now in the second phase of encouraging people to adopt electric vehicles, and this announcement signals that the Government is taking the road to zero seriously. The initial grants stimulated strong demand with early adopters, and it was right that they were rewarded for their decisions. However, it didn’t necessarily encourage the right behaviours.

"We know that many drivers still use the petrol function on their hybrids – which doesn’t benefit the environment in any way; so actually, the Government’s changes means they’re targeting a behaviour change in motorists, to really accelerate the road to zero. This is ultimately a good move as it should drive a consistent, environmentally beneficial attitudinal shift, even if it now means fewer vehicles will be eligible for grants."

The plug-in van grant remains unchanged.

Read more in the next edition of Fleet News.

 

Click here for electric cars and hybrids best practice and procurement insight

Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Comment as guest


Login  /  Register

Comments

  • The Engineer - 12/10/2018 08:18

    As much as I love my PHEV, this is the final nail as to why I am abandoning them on replacement. The continual company car tax hikes against the high (now higher!) list prices make it less attractive than it used to be. And now my employer is expecting me to provide them with my electricity at home for free to power my business mileage! - not a chance! I might as well have a petrol car, the BIK being far smaller I will end up no worse off. Pity really to be going backwards.

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register
  • mr.Bean - 12/10/2018 09:09

    I think some are missing the point. Cars like the 330e and the Outlander should never been included within the Grant. Most were used for tax “avoidance” and not really for what the Grant was meant to be used. I believe only pure EV’s should get it and would have been nice to have kept it at £4500 for PLG.

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register
    • The Engineer - 12/10/2018 11:23

      "Most were used for tax “avoidance” do you have any evidence of that? Everyone I know in our fleet plugs in. If drivers didn't then it was their companies fault for not reimbursing for electricity use by sticking with fuel cards. Switching to AFR reimbursement makes it stupid, if not essential to plug-in.

      Reply as guest

      Login  /  Register
      • Sage & Onion - 12/10/2018 12:07

        We provide fuel cards and recover the cost of private mileage back from the driver using the "actual cost" calculation, which encourages them to plug in, get their average mpg up, and reduce their actual ppm fuel cost. There's no need to abandon fuel cards really.

        Reply as guest

        Login  /  Register
      • Nigel Boyle - 18/10/2018 13:04

        Yes - in one survey of a quantity going back to a leasing company all the charge leads were still wrapped up - unused!

        Reply as guest

        Login  /  Register
    • Sage & Onion - 12/10/2018 11:59

      I disagree. Every little helps to clean up air quality and all efforts should be put into encouraging all hybrids, PHEV's and pure EV's, because they all contribute in their own way to reduce air quality. But taking away the grant for all PHEV's has probably just killed that market once and for all because most will be pushed off choice lists on a WLC basis. There is no doubt that drivers choose cars like the 330e and the Outlander because of their low BIK but they still contribute as long as the employer encourages the driver, and provides facilities, to plug them in.

      Reply as guest

      Login  /  Register
    • Nigel Boyle - 18/10/2018 13:06

      Agreed

      Reply as guest

      Login  /  Register
  • peter - 12/10/2018 13:36

    so now the list price will be higher and lease cost also the PHEV revolution will slow dramatically as it moves the car away from the average company car drivers spend limits, added to that the ever more punitive taxation of company drivers who require a car as a tool to do their job it clearly shows that government policy is not about air pollution targets but just about raising revenue.

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register
  • Bill Fletcher - 17/10/2018 08:52

    The pure EV take up will still largely be the director level cars, Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz all have pure electrics in the near future however until employers change their fundamental company car policy to allow drivers a higher allowance banding for a pure EV vs. ICE then the take up will not be available to the masses. A WLC model needs to be adopted on policy to demonstrate the true benefits of running an EV but more importantly making it available to the masses!

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register
    • Nigel Boyle - 18/10/2018 13:06

      Take a read about the VW ID coming in 2019. Back to their roots of a 'Peoples Wagon'. It is a car for the everyday person at Golf pricing.

      Reply as guest

      Login  /  Register
  • Nigel Boyle - 18/10/2018 13:02

    I have a problem with plugs ins as they currently are, and believe they should have no grant. Imagine two cases: 1. Traditional diesel small SUV - 200 mile journey achieving 45 mpg. 2. Plug in Petrol small SUV - 200 mile journey, perhaps 20 mile on electric and 180 on petrol achieving 35 mpg. The diesel needs the grant for using less (now proven) cleaner fuel that the Plug In. The only reason they are popular is the falsely low BIK% granted. I know one person with an XC90 on 13% tax, I get on average 10 mpg more in my diesel Euro6 with 28% tax!

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register