Fleet News

Updated: Government wants all new cars and vans to have zero-emissions capability by 2040

EV charging

The Government’s new air quality plan says it will end the sale of all "conventional petrol and diesel cars" by 2040.

Hybrid cars, which combine a petrol or diesel engine with an electric motor, will still be permitted, the Government has confirmed, despite some initial confusion at the Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs (Defra).  

It will also provide a £255 million package to help councils tackle emissions from diesel vehicles, as part of a £3 billion package of spending on air quality.

However, the Government says that, wanting to maintain a tight control on public spending, measures to improve air quality will be funded through changes to the tax treatment for new diesel vehicles, or through reprioritisation within existing departmental budgets. Further details on changes to the tax regime will be announced later in the year in the budget.

The courts had ordered the Defra to produce a new air quality plan after judges agreed with environmental campaigners that previous plans were insufficient to meet EU pollution limits.

The Government had to publish its draft clean air strategy plans in May, with the final measures due by Monday (July 31).

The air quality plan puts the burden on local authorities to tackle the causes of air pollution, with the Government saying they should consider a wide range of "innovative options", exploring new technologies so that they can deliver reduced emissions in a way that best meets the needs of their communities and local businesses.

It continues: "Their plans could include a wide range of measures such as: changing road layouts at congestion and air pollution pinch points; encouraging public and private uptake of ULEVs; using innovative retrofitting technologies and new fuels; and, encouraging the use of public transport."

However, if these measures are not sufficient, local plans could include access restrictions on vehicles, such as charging zones or measures to prevent certain vehicles using particular roads at particular times, it says. 

The plan says that local authorities should bear in mind such access restrictions would only be necessary for a "limited period" and should be lifted once legal compliance is achieved and there is no risk of legal limits being breached again.

Local authorities will need to set out their initial plans eight months from now, by the end of March 2018. These will be followed by final plans by the end of December 2018. 

The Government says it will work with local authorities and others to consider how to help minimise the impact of such measures on local businesses, residents and those travelling into towns and cities to work where such action is necessary; and will issue a further consultation in autumn to aid development and assessment of options.

The measures considered in that consultation will include options to support motorists: in particular private car drivers on lower incomes, or those who may have to switch to a cleaner vehicle. Options considered could include retrofitting, subsidised car club membership, exemptions and discounts from any restrictions, permit schemes for vans or concessionary bus travel.

A targeted scrappage scheme will also be considered in this consultation focussing on certain groups of drivers who most need support (such as those on lower incomes or those living in the immediate vicinity of a Clean Air Zone) and providing an incentive to switch to a cleaner vehicle. 

It said: "A number of issues remain with such mitigation options and in particular with scrappage schemes – analysis of previous schemes has shown poor value for the taxpayer and that they are open to a degree of fraud."

Mike Hawes chief executive of industry group the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), told Fleet News that the there was nothing new in the Government's ambition for all new cars and vans to be zero emission by 2040.

“Industry is working with government to ensure that the right consumer incentives, policies, and infrastructure is in place to drive growth in the still very early market for ULEVs in the UK,” he said. “However, much depends on the cost of these new technologies and how willing consumers are to adopt battery, plug-in hybrid and hydrogen cars.

“Currently demand for alternatively fuelled vehicles is growing but still at a very low level as consumer have concern over affordability, range and charging points.

“Outright bans risk undermining the current market for new cars and our sector which supports over 800,000 jobs across the UK so the industry instead wants a positive approach which gives consumers incentives to purchase these cars.

“We could undermine the UK’s successful automotive sector if we don’t allow enough time for the industry to adjust."

Van drivers are also set to be given the right to use heavier vehicles if they are electric or gas-powered. Furthermore, manufacturers found to be using devices on their vehicles to cheat emissions tests could face criminal and civil charges, with fines of up to £50,000 for every device installed, under proposed new laws.

Sue Robinson, director of the National Franchised Dealers Association which represents commercial vehicle and franchised car retailers across the UK, argues that Euro 6 diesel cars should not be penalised. In 2016, over half a million new diesel vehicles were sold.

She said: “The Government needs to ensure that the correct measures are in place in areas where pollution is at its highest and also ensure that these are not detrimental to the local economy.

“It is also important that there is investment in electric vehicle infrastructure, particularly charging points. There is pressure from local authorities on private business to invest in the local grid infrastructure, to ensure that the UK electric provisions can cope with the increase in electricity used for charging these vehicles." 

Peter Millichap, UK director of marketing at Teletrac Navman, told Fleet News that he welcomed any measures which help combat pollution and improve air quality. However, he added: "It raises many questions in terms of how it will be implemented. 

"For example, will we have the infrastructure to cater for all UK road users to drive electric vehicles in just 23 years? This will mean having to transition from fuel stations to public charging points overtime. Whilst this would be a significant achievement and very logically progressive, the practicalities and costs of implementing this will be in the billions." 

David Brennan, CEO at Nexus Vehicle Rental, concluded: “The shift to electric vehicles and hybrids is already happening but this is a costly, long transition period and petrol and diesel engines will continue to dominate. We need to question if setting a deadline to remove petrol and diesel vehicles is the wisest course of action to take.

“Rather than to ban new petrol and diesel vehicles, would it not make more sense to phase out older, less fuel efficient cars and vans first? Manufacturing processes are making vehicles cleaner and we shouldn’t prevent progress from being made.”

                                                                                             

Click here for fuel and fuel cards best practice and procurement insight

Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Comment as guest


Login  /  Register

Comments

  • john4870 - 26/07/2017 12:52

    Hybrids have been around for more than 10 years and have sold in their millions - yet so many drivers still don't understand them, let alone plug-in hybrids and fuel cells. Shouldn't we start with educating drivers (and a lot of our politicians too!) to understand them properly - so that they have a chance of making better well-informed decisions? Then we might have a chance of inspiring change.

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register
  • Bob Dale - 26/07/2017 19:06

    Having been directly employed in the motor industry and its associated teaching/training for 45 years, I have now retired but still take an active interest in all aspects of automotive engineering and technology. I believe that there is a need for a transparent view of the whole emissions debate, if the general public are to be given informed choices about their vehicle purchases in the future. I have read recently, many comments, blogs and articles related to the “Dirty Diesel” perception that is being pushed upon us. It would appear that there is considerable ignorance as to the formation of NOx and indeed the biggest culprits. So first of all, lets dispel the myth that diesel is the only producer of NOx, as ANY form of combustion or heating of the air by ANY fuel/heat source to a temperature in excess of 1600 degrees Celsius produces NOx. As an example, experts estimate that around 8.6 million tonnes of NOx are produced by lightening strikes alone every year. Whilst I can see the concern about the concentration of NOx, (and other pollutants) in areas predominantly of high population and thus high traffic volumes, high density housing (with gas or oil fired boilers etc.) and often one or more high volume airports, all of which, contribute to the overall quantity of NOx (and other) emissions. The solution to the problem is not quite as simple as the ‘Headlines’ might suggest, and it cannot be just a ‘one hit wonder’ answer. Therefore, it is clear that proposed punitive tax increases and the banning of diesel cars will not make the problem go away, as there are many other culprits creating higher volumes of NOx that also need to be dealt with. There are those that argue that the way forward, is by the use of electric cars, and in an ideal world it probably is. However, until we can meet the domestic and commercial demand for electricity without the use of increased volumes of coal, oil and gas being burned, the additional burden to recharge millions of electric cars using even more fossil fuel, seems not so environmentally friendly, but may help to reduce local high levels of NOx and improve political voting. Perhaps the counter argument should be, that we all encourage motorists to buy newer highly frugal efficient diesel engine cars that will help to reduce the volume of fossil fuel actually burned, and fitted with dedicated exhaust gas after treatment systems to reduce or even eliminate NOx emissions. These are technologies that currently exist and are continually being developed and improved. If only other transport industries were as proactive!! Finally, consider an Airbus 320 twin-engine aircraft. It has a fuel consumption rate of around 695 gallons of fuel per hour, and estimates are that there are approx. 100,000 aircraft in the air at any one time globally. Using the Airbus as average size, that would mean that globally, aircraft are burning somewhere in the region of 69.5 million gallons of TAX FREE fuel every hour. Surely, a significant unchallenged contributor to global and local pollution, including high volumes of NOx. Are there any plans to ban the use of fossil fuels in Rail, Shipping and Aircraft?........I think NOT! And I am sure that all those who take the moral high ground on emissions, would not want to give up their flights to meetings, conventions and exotic holiday destinations!!

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register
Compare costs of your company cars

Looking to acquire new vehicles? Check how much they'll cost to run with our Car Running Cost calculator.

What is your BIK car tax liability?

The Fleet News car tax calculator lets you work out tax costs for both employer and employee