Fleet News

Credit hire legal battle moves to House of Lords

THE battle between the insurance and credit hire industries will go to the House of Lords, after a Court of Appeal ruling this week. The dispute focuses on the terms of the contracts between credit hire companies which supply temporary replacement cars to the non-fault parties involved in road traffic accidents, and their customers.

Insurers claim many of these contracts fall foul of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and are therefore unenforceable in law, according to David Faithful, solicitor and insurance partner with Amery-Parkes. He said if a credit hire firm could not enforce its contract with its own customers, then the contracts were also un-enforceable with the insurers of the 'guilty' third parties.

As a result, insurers have refused to pay out on many credit hire claims.

In the Dimond v Lovell test case, the County Court found in favour of credit hire 1st Automotive (now owned by Helphire), but this verdict was overturned by the Court of Appeal. In a new twist, the Court of Appeal has now given 1st Automotive leave to appeal to the House of Lords. The hearing is pencilled in for January 17, 18 and 19 next year, with a verdict expected before Easter.

Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Login to comment


No comments have been made yet.

Compare costs of your company cars

Looking to acquire new vehicles? Check how much they'll cost to run with our Car Running Cost calculator.

What is your BIK car tax liability?

The Fleet News car tax calculator lets you work out tax costs for both employer and employee